[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
Satish, As I said, I think your solution (the reverse temporal order) is a good one. I think I have a simple compromise: that we add a sentence to the effect that " Note: Sole reliance on implicit compensation handlers as a programming construct or as a means of defining default system behavior is not recommended." This may address both the "programmatic" (Yaron's) and default behavior (my own) assumptions. Not sure about Peter's concern. - Sid.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]