[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit compensation Handler
+1 > -----Original Message----- > From: Sid Askary [mailto:saskary@nuperus.com] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 1:46 PM > To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [wsbpel] Resolution to issue 10 - Implicit > compensation Handler > > > Satish, > As I said, I think your solution (the reverse temporal order) > is a good one. I think I have a simple compromise: that we > add a sentence to the effect that > > " Note: Sole reliance on implicit compensation handlers as a > programming construct or as a means of defining default > system behavior is not recommended." > > This may address both the "programmatic" (Yaron's) and > default behavior (my own) assumptions. > > Not sure about Peter's concern. > > - Sid. > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster of the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le > ave_workgroup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]