RE: [wsbpel] Issue 24 - separate schemata for abstract and executable processes

["John Evdemon" <jevdemon@microsoft.com>]

On Friday, December 12, 2003 4:32 PM, Danny van der Rijn wrote: 
> 
> while the current schemas were published, the current document still
has the
> schemas, i believe.  and the current schemas don't provide separate
schemas
> for abstract and executable processes.
>
> if i'm showing the effects of jet lag, please let  me know..
>
I think the schemas should remain in the spec (appendices) _and_ be made
available as separate files (as they are now).  

The current spec doesn't use separate schemas for abstract and
executable processes - isn't this one of the reasons you raised issue #
24?  

John