RE: [wsbpel] Issue 53 - Motion for consideration by the TC

["Haugen Robert" <Robert.Haugen@choreology.com>]

Satish Thatte wrote:

> 2. The simple outcome-notification for cancel/confirm 
> is just one stylized pattern for process coordination.  
> Other patterns are possible -- for instance one where 
> the original work (e.g., a purchase order) may be changed 
> rather than just cancelled/confirmed.  But with the 
> explicit handler approach this would require additional
> syntactic extensions (a change handler?).

Do you mean where one party makes an offer to buy
(which is the business semantic of a purchase order)
and the counter-party, instead of accepting or rejecting
the offer, makes a counter-offer?

In other words, do you mean a negotiated order?