[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 67 - Proposal for vote
Satish, That sounds good. I'd recommend adding an extra sentence at the end, so that it reads (addition in bold): "Note that serialization of variable access cannot lead to internal deadlock in a BPEL process instance. The reason being that, conceptually, a serializable scope is not started until it can gain sufficiently exclusive access to all the non-local variables it needs. This is analogous to pessimestic locking schemes used to control concurrent access to database resources."This language parallels that used to clarify the behaviour of serializable scopes later in the same section. I believe this reflects the conclusion of an email discussion we had about serializable scopes back in October. Regards, -Ron Satish Thatte wrote: I propose that we add the following sentences to section to Section 13.6 following paragraph 2. "Note that serialization of variable access cannot lead to internal deadlock in a BPEL process instance. The reason being that, conceptually, a serializable scope is not started until it can gain sufficiently exclusive access to all the non-local variables it needs." Satish To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]