RE: [wsbpel] FW: [wsbpel-uc] RE: Issue 24

["Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com>]

Guys:

In Novemember of last year Ben Bloch wrote:

Better describe abstract processes in spec, particularly in terms of
what they are, what they are not, and the relationshop between abstract
and executable processes. This is mostly wordsmithing the spec along the
lines of the messages Steve Capell, 23 Oct 2003, Ben Bloch, 24 Oct 2003,
Frank Leymann, 25 Oct 2003 (identified in the list below as "possible
text").

Having just completed reading the 1.1 rewrite. I think this issue still
Needs addressing. Plus, it's still open. Any comments.

Phil