Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 95 - Proposal to Vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

+1

Giving it a special name seems reasonable given its limited use.

Alex Yiu wrote:

> Hi DK,
> 
> Do you think it may be a better idea to rename <throw/> to <rethrow/>?
> 
> Since <throw/> or <rethrow/> can only happens within <catchAll>, it
> would be easier for BPEL users to distinguish the difference
> syntactially, if it is named as <rethrow/>. And, it would be easier for
> XML Schema of BPEL to enforce that semantics without relying on
> after-schema-validation semantics check of BPEL
> translator/compiler/processor implementation.
> 
> (This idea came from one of my co-workers: Viru Singh.)
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Regards,
> Alex Yiu
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dieter Koenig1 wrote:
> 
>  >Proposed resolution for Issue 95: Allow all custom fault handlers
>  >rethrowing the original fault.
>  >
>  >Rationale: Default fault handlers, in addition to other steps, rethrow the
>  >original fault. Custom fault handlers must be able to express the default
>  >behavior as well.
>  >
>  >Proposed syntax:
>  >   <throw/>
>  >(without attributes).
>  >
>  >Example:
>  >   <catchAll>
>  >      <sequence>
>  >         ...
>  >         <throw/> <!-- this is a rethrow of the original fault -->
>  >      </sequence>
>  >   <catchAll>
>  >
>  >Kind Regards
>  >DK
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> 
>  >
>  > 
>  >
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the 
> OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>