[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - Good Idea!
I agree. Using the $variable syntax would simplify writing and reading BPEL. Regarding referencing WSDL message type variables; in case the part refers to an XML Schema element and not a type, would we not want the first part of the path to refer to the fully qualified element name, and not the part name? Kristofer -----Original Message----- From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 4:55 PM To: wsbpeltc Subject: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - Good Idea! The more I think about 103 the better an idea I think it is. I wonder if we couldn't possibly make it work for WSDL types messages? Could we say that if the variable is of type WSDL message then there MUST be at least one path segment attached to it and that the path segment MUST be the name of a part in the WSDL message? Yaron To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup. php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]