OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 103 - WSDL 1.1 schema



Hi all,

Just some interim status report on Issue 103 ...
In the last BPEL F2F in Germany, I took an action item to make a proposal on Issue 103.
(which have some linkages to Issue 107 and 11)

As I am working on it, I would like to point out that there are different versions of WSDL 1.1 schema floating around on the net. They can look quite different:


http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/2003-02-11.xsd
-------------------------
    <xs:complexType name="tPart">
        <xs:complexContent>
            <xs:extension base="wsdl:tExtensibleAttributesDocumented">
                <xs:attribute name="name" type="xs:NCName" use="required"/>
                <xs:attribute name="element" type="xs:QName" use="optional"/>
                <xs:attribute name="type" type="xs:QName" use="optional"/>
            </xs:extension>
        </xs:complexContent>
    </xs:complexType>
-------------------------

http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
-------------------------
    <complexType name="partType">
        <complexContent>
            <extension base="wsdl:openAtts">
                <attribute name="name" type="NMTOKEN" use="optional"/>
                <attribute name="type" type="QName" use="optional"/>
                <attribute name="element" type="QName" use="optional"/>
            </extension>
        </complexContent>
    </complexType>
-------------------------

I have contacted the WS-I team at Oracle for clarification.  (Appreciate their help very much).
WS-I BP 1.0 has clarified the schema which are the reference:

see R2028 and R2029 under 5.1 Document Structure [1]

WSDL: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/2003-02-11.xsd
SOAP: http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/2003-02-11.xsd

[1] http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/Basic/2003-08/BasicProfile-1.0a.html#WSDLDOCSTRUCT


So, the schema in the W3C note should not be the one that we should refer to.
(That also means that we don't support unamed message part).

Once I have a draft on Issue 103 proposal, I will send it out. Hopefully, I can finish within a couple of weeks.


Thank you for reading this email.




Regards,
Alex Yiu





[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]