Re: [wsbpel] Q: Link Name Scoping

[rkhalaf <rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com>]

Hi
Yes. the link name is scoped to the flow construct, so the target is of 
link L1 of F2.
I just skimmed the spec and couldn't find where it explicitly says that.

rania

Yuzo Fujishima wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I have a few questions on link name scoping. If it turns
>out that the current specification cannot answer them,
>I would propose a new issue later.
>
>Suppose we have the following process:
>
><flow name="F1">
>  <links>
>    <link name="L1"/> <!-- L1 is defined here and ... -->
>  </links>
>  <sequence name="S1">
>    <flow name="F2">
>      <links>
>        <link name="L1"/> <!-- ... here -->
>      </links>
>      <sequence name="S2">
>          <invoke name="I1" ...>
>            <target linkName="L1"/> <!-- Which L1? -->
>          </invoke>
>          ...
>
>Note that link L1 is defined at two places.
>Q1: Is this definition legal?
>Q2: If legal, is I1 target of L1 of F2 (F2.L1)
>    or L1 of F1 (F1.L1)?
>
>My guess and preference is:
>A1: Yes
>A2: F2.L1.
>
>Yuzo Fujishima
>NEC Corporation
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>  
>