[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added
|
Hi Phil and John, I think it is a good idea to get input ideas from Proforma on how they think an abstract BPEL should look like and their intended usage of abstract BPEL. It seems to me that they have interesting customer profiles and they have hands-on experience in this domain. And, just to clarify ... an example I shall try to cook is about whether it make sense to have an optional switch on constraining opaque activities and attributes are only extension points. My gut feelings tell me that we would allow arbitrary extension from abstract BPEL without using opaque activities by default. Thanks! [Ref: http://www.proformacorp.com/ ] Regards, Alex Yiu Rossomando, Philip wrote: John: We need to get this Abstract process use case Example out. Maybe we can ask Alex to get the example out ASAP (thanks Alex). Or maybe we can Look at what is available from Proforma (a company Unisys is working with). They claim to have a Suitable syntax for abstract BPEL processes. I would Be willing to help out. Maybe too Yaron should be Invited to our UC meeting to suggest an appropriate Use case. Phil Rossomando Research Director, Technology & Architecture Unisys Corporation Unisys Way, B-330 Blue Bell, PA 19424 USA Philip.rossomando@unisys.com 215-986-3998 FAX 413-0215-2043 -----Original Message----- From: John Evdemon [mailto:jevdemon@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:16 PM To: Rossomando, Philip Cc: wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added Phil, We decided to continue having the Use Case Conf Calls on alternate Tuesdays (weeks in which we do not have a TC call) at 4 PM ET. I will be posting the minutes/action items later today. Sorry for any confusion I may have caused regarding today's call. John-----Original Message----- From: Rossomando, Philip [mailto:Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 2:11 PM To: John Evdemon Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added I will attend if I can call from home. So seven then? Phil Rossomando Research Director, Technology & Architecture Unisys Corporation Unisys Way, B-330 Blue Bell, PA 19424 USA Philip.rossomando@unisys.com 215-986-3998 FAX 413-0215-2043 -----Original Message----- From: John Evdemon [mailto:jevdemon@microsoft.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 1:08 PM To: David RR Webber; Rossomando, Philip; Husband, Yin-Leng; Rand Anderson; wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added Importance: High Would this time work for everyone? 7 PM ET? Please let me know. Reminder: we are scheduled to have a call today at 4 PM ET. We can reschedule this call for later in the week at 7 PM ET if that is the time that best fits everyone's schedules. Please let me know. John ________________________________ From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info] Sent: Tue 4/6/2004 7:44 AM To: Rossomando, Philip; Husband, Yin-Leng; Rand Anderson; wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org; John Evdemon Subject: Re: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added Yin Leng - actually later is better for me. 7pm EST would be cool. Just a lot happens in that 4 to 6:30pm window! DW. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rossomando, Philip" <Philip.Rossomando@unisys.com> To: "Husband, Yin-Leng" <yin-leng.husband@hp.com>; "Rand Anderson" <randerson@macgregor.com>; "David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>; <wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org>; <jevdemon@microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 7:03 AM Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added I will be happy with what ever the others want. It is hard to satisfy everyone when we are distributed Around the world. Phil Rossomando Research Director, Technology & Architecture Unisys Corporation Unisys Way, B-330 Blue Bell, PA 19424 USA Philip.rossomando@unisys.com 215-986-3998 FAX 413-0215-2043 -----Original Message----- From: Husband, Yin-Leng [mailto:yin-leng.husband@hp.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 3:37 AM To: Rand Anderson; David RR Webber; wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis- open.org; jevdemon@microsoft.com Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added 4 pm EDT is equivalent to 6 am for me in Australia. Unfortunately, any earlier time like 2 pm EDT (= to 4 am in Australia) will not work for me. Thanks, Yin Leng -----Original Message----- From: Rand Anderson [mailto:randerson@macgregor.com] Sent: Friday, 26 March 2004 11:41 PM To: 'David RR Webber'; wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org; jevdemon@microsoft.com Subject: RE: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added The same usually applies to me; I can accommodate 4pm EST, but earlier would be better for the same reasons. Thx, Rand -----Original Message----- From: David RR Webber [mailto:david@drrw.info] Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:57 PM To: wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org; jevdemon@microsoft.com Subject: Re: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added John, Just got back in and saw the note. 4pm to 5pm EST is tough from myself on EST - as it usually corresponds to some rush out the door - or need to finish something before rushing out of the door! Can we do 2 to 3pm EST in future? What does everyone else think? Thanks, DW ----- Original Message ----- From: <jevdemon@microsoft.com> To: <wsbpel-uc@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 9:35 PM Subject: [wsbpel-uc] Groups - Rescheduled Conf Call added |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]