[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Using RelaxNG
Hello, >From: Ugo >>So, I suspect the reaction from most BPEL implementers and users to the >idea of using RelaxNG for BPEL language description would be something >like: "Thank you, but no thanks. XSD already keeps me busy enough ...". From: Dieter Roller >+1 +1 from me too, however I wonder if anybody is using a declarative language to express static analysis restrictions? That would be good to share the same syntax. Currently we do some stuff with XSLT "test" transformations, but thats not the stuff I can share, in the current way. But any XML assertion language which supports stuff like "for any x where y must be z" would be nice. Greetings Bernd
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]