[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 122 - Clearify wording for Message Exchange Patterns
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list. The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent document with the title in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
A possible resolution would be, to remove the term synchronous, while talking about operations, in favor of the term "two way" or request-response or something similiar.
Note: it is not so easy to use the MEP names from WSDL, since they are afaik
not defined for wsdl1.1 and they refer to an operation from the provider
and consumer side, whereas BPEL only knows the provider side
as receive/replay and the consumer side as invoke.
Links: This issue was discovered in the discussion about issue 118 : When are Correlation Sets Mandatory?
Changes: 20 Apr 2004 - new issue
To comment on this issue, please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 122 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution, please start the subject line "Issue - 122 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]