[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] the language name (abbreviation)
Yuzo, I think a version 1.0 would create confusion, regardless of which name we choose. I would prefer version 1.2 (to distinguish from the TC original submission), or even 2.0 if we think there are sufficient differences with 1.1 to justify a new main version number (the same way the W3C WSD WG jumped from WSDL 1.1 to WSDL 2.0). Ugo > -----Original Message----- > From: Yuzo Fujishima [mailto:fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2004 6:54 PM > To: 'wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org' > Subject: Re: [wsbpel] the language name (abbreviation) > > > Hi, > > Just a minor comment. > I think the version number of the specification released by > the TC should be 1.0. If we choose WS-BPEL/WSBPEL, no > problem. But for BPEL4WS there already is 1.0. > > Yuzo Fujishima > NEC Corporation > > Alex Yiu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I prefer WS-BPEL or WSBPEL over BPEL4WS. > > Because, WSBPEL is the charter id for this TC. > > And, I believe we need to use the charter id in names of > our external > > visible deliverable files. > > (e.g. spec and XSD file) (based on an OASIS doc that Diane > forwarded to > > me earlier). > > > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Alex Yiu > > > > > > > > > > Trickovic, Ivana wrote: > > > >> According to the charter for this TC, the name of language > this group > >> is working on is Web Services Business Process Execution > Language. The > >> specification working draft is consistently using that > name just in > >> the title (e.g. excerpt from the specification: "This > document defines > >> a notation for specifying business process behavior based on Web > >> Services. This notation is called Business Process > Execution Language > >> for Web Services (abbreviated to BPEL4WS in the rest of this > >> document)..."). > >> Shouldn't we say: "This notation is called Web Services Business > >> Process Execution Language..."? > >> > >> How should the abbreviation look like: (keep) BPEL4WS, WS-BPEL or > >> WSBPEL? Any other proposal? > >> > >> (As I already said, this is really a minor non-technical issue). > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Ivana > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from > the roster > >> of the OASIS TC), go to > >> > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le ave_workgroup.php. >> >> >> >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster > of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr oup.php. > > > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr oup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]