Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 34 - Proposal for vote

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>Thatte: Notice I carefully said "abstraction relative to a standards proposal"
>which *could* mean that we don't bind ourselves to a fixed namespace,
>depending on emerging timelines.  I don't think we will delay finishing
>BPEL just because we are waiting for other standards work to be
>completed.
>
mm1: If that is true, I suggest we take action to ensure WS-BPEL be 
successful by making a decision on Issue 34 to effect a predictable 
outcome. If we place our dependency on other consortia or standards 
organizations, actions of industry vendors, or other variables outside 
our control, we stand to delay our work. Thanks.