RE: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 34 - Proposal for vote

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

I do want to iterate my support for the position Paco and Yaron have
espoused -- nothing is lost by waiting for a few weeks to see where this
stuff is going.  We have few dependencies on this resolution if any, and
plenty of other issues to work on.

Satish

-----Original Message-----
From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 11:15 AM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: Martin Chapman; ygoland@bea.com; Ron Ten-Hove; Francisco Curbera;
wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Re: Issue 34 - Proposal for vote


>Thatte: Notice I carefully said "abstraction relative to a standards
proposal"
>which *could* mean that we don't bind ourselves to a fixed namespace,
>depending on emerging timelines.  I don't think we will delay finishing
>BPEL just because we are waiting for other standards work to be
>completed.
>
mm1: If that is true, I suggest we take action to ensure WS-BPEL be 
successful by making a decision on Issue 34 to effect a predictable 
outcome. If we place our dependency on other consortia or standards 
organizations, actions of industry vendors, or other variables outside 
our control, we stand to delay our work. Thanks.