Re: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>
>
> Thatte: As a part of the recommended resolution of issues issue 30 : 
> Support for coordination protocol 
> <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue30#Issue30>, 
> issue 53 : Include Business Transaction Management (BTM) constructs 
> <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html#Issue53#Issue53>,54-59, 
> the F2F meeting recommended removing the current Appendix C which 
> appears to take a hard dependency on the WS-Coordination and 
> WS-Transaction specifications. During the discussion at the F2F I 
> pointed out that it would be desirable to preserve the content in so 
> far as it provides a succinct model for the semantics of inter scope 
> coordination in BPEL without the dependency on external 
> specifications.  The sentiment expressed was that this sounded like a 
> good idea but would be best discussed as a separate issue.  I 
> accordingly added issue 115.
> I propose that we vote on it at the nearest opportunity.
>
> * Proposed Motion: * The resolution of issue 53 requires appendix C to 
> be deleted.  This motion is to add back a reworked appendix C to 
> preserve the relevant content without external dependencies.
>
mm1: Satish, could you please provide a revised Appendix C so this 
resolution can be reviewed by the team? Thank you.