[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote
I would have to agree with Monica that this is not at the granulity to hand off to the editorial team. I really would like to see revised text before voting on this issue. Cheers, Martin. >-----Original Message----- >From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] >Sent: 08 June 2004 20:46 >To: Monica J. Martin; Diane Jordan >Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote > > >Fairly straightforward I think. Appendix C is primarily a >state machine which explains the "protocol" between nested >scopes in BPEL. There is no essential dependency on any >external specification. It is simply an aid to understanding >our rather intricate fault and compensation handling >semantics. That is how the new version of the appendix would >be written, i.e., as an explanation of BPEL inter-scope >semantics with no references to external specifications. > >Satish > >-----Original Message----- >From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] >Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:41 PM >To: Diane Jordan >Cc: Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote > >Diane Jordan wrote: > >> >> I think our process calls for this resolution to be approved and then >> the spec editing team to work up the revised appendix which >would then > >> be approved by the TC in the next update. > >mm1: Diane, given the context of the discussion regarding Issue 30 and >53-59 and the subsequent opening of 115, how can we evaluate the >re-inclusion of Appendix C with no information? Thanks. > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >roster of the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/lea ve_workgroup.php.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]