[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote
Appendix C is in essence self contained as it stands if the references to WS-BA are removed. The main work is to make sure that it is a complete and internally consistent description of our semantics, adding further explanations that are needed for clarity. -----Original Message----- From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:17 PM To: Satish Thatte; 'Monica J. Martin'; 'Diane Jordan' Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote Satish, I get scared if you say it's a lot of work, without knowing what the lot of work is!!!! However I appreciate you not wanting to do all that work if guys like me are going to vote no after:-) Maybe as a compromise, some more detail on what you propose to change from the current appendix C will help. Martin. >-----Original Message----- >From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] >Sent: 08 June 2004 21:03 >To: Martin Chapman; Monica J. Martin; Diane Jordan >Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote > > >What is it that you are concerned about? It is a lot of work >to do without approval. I don't mind not adding this appendix >- it is just an aid to understanding the specification. I >will let the TC decide if this is needed. > >Satish > >-----Original Message----- >From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] >Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 1:00 PM >To: Satish Thatte; 'Monica J. Martin'; 'Diane Jordan' >Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote > >I would have to agree with Monica that this is not at the >granulity to hand off to the editorial team. I really would >like to see revised text before voting on this issue. > >Cheers, > Martin. >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com] >>Sent: 08 June 2004 20:46 >>To: Monica J. Martin; Diane Jordan >>Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote >> >> >>Fairly straightforward I think. Appendix C is primarily a >>state machine which explains the "protocol" between nested >>scopes in BPEL. There is no essential dependency on any >>external specification. It is simply an aid to understanding >>our rather intricate fault and compensation handling >>semantics. That is how the new version of the appendix would >>be written, i.e., as an explanation of BPEL inter-scope >>semantics with no references to external specifications. >> >>Satish >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] >>Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 12:41 PM >>To: Diane Jordan >>Cc: Satish Thatte; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 115: Proposal to vote >> >>Diane Jordan wrote: >> >>> >>> I think our process calls for this resolution to be >approved and then >>> the spec editing team to work up the revised appendix which >>would then >> >>> be approved by the TC in the next update. >> >>mm1: Diane, given the context of the discussion regarding Issue 30 and >>53-59 and the subsequent opening of 115, how can we evaluate the >>re-inclusion of Appendix C with no information? Thanks. >> >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >>roster of the OASIS TC), go to >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/lea >ve_workgroup.php. > > > >To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the >roster of >the OASIS TC), go to >http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/lea >ve_workgr >oup.php. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]