Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 114 - Proposal to Vote

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

>> Koening: Proposed resolution for issue 114:
>>
>> (1) Add text to the specification that clarifies the semantics in 
>> presence
>> of multiple correlation sets:
>> <clarification>
>> If multiple correlation sets with initiate="no" are used in a receive,
>> pick/onMessage, or eventHandler/onEvent, then they must all match a
>> message for that message to be delivered to the activity in the given
>> process instance.
>> </clarification>
>>
>> (2) Ignore all references to EPRs in this issue and revisit that when 
>> 34 is
>> resolved.
>>
> mm1: Dieter, on (1), the sentence is a bit unclear. Are you saying the 
> "they must all match a message <property values> must all match for 
> that message to be
> delivered....? Perhaps you could clarify. Thanks.

mm2: Cut and past error. Are you saying the "they must all match a 
message <property values> for that message to be
delivered....?"