[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - Proposal for vote
It wouldn't. We should discuss at the F2F what this might mean and what the scenarios are -- it is not clear what a "partnerLink" means in the context of your example. ________________________________ From: Assaf Arkin [mailto:arkin@intalio.com] Sent: Thu 6/17/2004 1:55 PM To: Furniss, Peter Cc: Satish Thatte; Alex Yiu; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Yuzo Fujishima; Dieter Koenig1; Yaron Y. Goland; Nickolas Kavantzas Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 37 - Proposal for vote Furniss, Peter wrote: > > RULE: For an inbound activity with createInstance=no, there must be at > least one correlation set with initiate=no to allow the message to be > routed to the appropriate process instance. There may be other > correlation sets with yes or rendezvous: > How would that work if the process wants to receive notifications that are broadcast to a large audience (pub/sub)? Assaf
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]