Issue 121

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Glen,

I am trying to interpret the suggested resolution for 121.  I presume that the "finally" fragment is deemed part of the enclosing scope for fault handling etc so it can run whether the exit was due to fault or not, but the tendency will be to deem it a part of the exiting scope for variable access.  A divergence between fault handling and variable declaration attributes of scopes.  This goes in the direction of distinguishing reversible scopes from other kinds which we tried for Issue 1 and gave up on.

Thoughts?

Satish