[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 123 - Matching <reply> with <receive>
Hello Yuzo, the problem with giving two receives the same MEP (or the same id) is, that it is hard/impossible to statically analyse the situation, and decide if it is a valid usage of reply. With the unique solution, one can be a bit more safe. Of course there are more runtime errors which can happen, so it might not be too interesting to avoid this particular. However, I am not sure if the case of different receives with a single reply is very common. One possible option to MEP elements would be to have the variable holding the received message to have a special meaning, so you can "reply" to the request variable. That would be essentially the MEP name, without the need for a new construct. However it would require some variables to be "special". Mit freundlichen Grüßen Bernd Eckenfels Chief Architect -- SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256 mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de - http://www.seeburger.de
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]