RE: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

Monica,
I think what you are asking is different than what happened with UDDI.
There the UDDI group developed the Note, and then asked us to review it.
But what you are asking, if I understand well your proposal, is that
this group undertakes the task of developing a Reg/Rep Note instead of
just reviewing something developed by the Reg/Reg group. If that is the
case, I would have serious concerns in terms of time availability at
this phase of our work.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 11:33 AM
> To: John Evdemon
> Cc: Eckenfels. Bernd; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org; Farrukh Najmi
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] "Using BPEL4WS in a Registry" .......
> 
> 
> 
> >Evdemon: I'm not sure if anyone has time to work on such a document.
> >
> mm1: There are folks that could work on it; there is a 
> Reg/Rep team and 
> I would venture to say others that have an interest in BPEL 
> TC (although 
> I can not speak for other than myself). Besides, as indicated 
> by several 
> parties on this list, any technical note needs to pend until abstract 
> BPEL is more concrete (broadly speaking).
> 
> >Besides, won't this just distract from the BPEL/UDDI paper?
> >
> mm1: Why would you infer any 'distract'-ion from UDDI? Are we saying 
> that we discriminate in the technologies that are under the 
> OASIS tent? 
> Is there a reason to do so?
> 
> >Who supports Reg/Rep?
> >
> mm1: See the links provided by the email: many international 
> governments 
> to start. Reading is a great source of education, John (see 
> below :-P ). 
> Thanks.
> 
> >>[1] Suggested links (Note particularly [e], [g] and WSRP
> >>technical note [j]:
> >>[a] [Ann] freebXML Registry version 3.0-alpha2 release 
> >>http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=385589
> >>[b] freebXML Registry http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net
> >>[c] Reference Deployments of freebXML Registry 
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/aboutFAQ/About_freebXML_Registr
> >>y.html#Deployments 
> >>
> >>[d] ebXML Registry 2.1 Specifications (Approved OASIS and ISO
> >>Standard) 
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.1/specs
> >>[e] ebXML Registry 2.6 Specifications (Latest preliminary 
> 3.0 drafts)
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/8475/ebRIM-2.6.doc
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/8476/ebRS-2.6.doc
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/documents/2.5/specs
> >>[f] ebXML Registry Technical Committee
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/regrep/
> >>[g] Web Content Management using ebXML Registry (XML Europe 2003):
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/xml
> >>Europe2004-webcm-ebxmlrr.ppt 
> >>
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/xml
> >>Europe2004-webcm-ebxmlrr.sxi
> >>
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/presentations/xmlEurope2004/04-
> >>02-02.pdf
> >>[h] Java API for XML Registries
> >>http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=93
> >>[i] LDAP, UDDI and ebXML Registry feature comparison matrix 
> >>http://ebxmlrr.sourceforge.net/tmp/Registry_Capability_Matrix.html
> >>[j] Using ebXML Registry to Manage WSRP Artifacts 
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/7538/wsrp-
pfb-ebxml-tn-draft-05.pdf 
>>    
>>



To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgr
oup.php.