RE: New BPEL Issue - add explicit conformance statements / section

["Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>]

Title: Message

Drat!  Thanks Vinkesh  Attachment attached this time I hope

Dear Colleagues,

 

I move that we accept a new "bug" issue into the issues list concerned with adding an explicit set of conformance statements, preferably in a conformance section, to the specification for 'BPEL'.  The rationale and a draft proposal is given in the attached document.

 

Resolving this issue will not lead to the addition of any new features..  However, it will enhance and clarify the text in a significant manner and therefore is worth tackling at this time.

 

The process of adding such a conformance section will cause us to think about and address the following questions:

 

For what sort of 'things' can conform to the BPEL specification?

 

For each type of 'thing' for which conformance can be claimed, what precisely does that thing have to be / do / not do to be conformant.

 

Best Regards,

Tony                          

	Tony Fletcher Technical Advisor Choreology Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J   UK
	Phone:	+44 (0) 1473 729537
	Mobile:	+44 (0) 7801 948219
	Fax:	+44 (0) 870 7390077
	Web:	www.choreology.com
Cohesions™
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
Home: amfletcher@iee.org

 

2004-08-27_Contribution to WSBPEL on Conformance.doc