wsbpel message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: RE: New BPEL Issue - add explicit conformance statements / section
- From: "Tony Fletcher" <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
- To: <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 18:15:31 +0100
Title: Message
Drat! Thanks
Vinkesh Attachment attached this time I
hope
Dear
Colleagues,
I move that we
accept a new "bug" issue into the issues list concerned with adding an explicit
set of conformance statements, preferably in a conformance section, to the
specification for 'BPEL'. The rationale and a draft proposal is given in
the attached document.
Resolving this issue
will not lead to the addition of any new features.. However, it will
enhance and clarify the text in a significant manner and therefore is worth
tackling at this time.
The process of
adding such a conformance section will cause us to think about and address the
following questions:
For what sort of
'things' can conform to the BPEL specification?
For each type of
'thing' for which conformance can be claimed, what precisely does that thing
have to be / do / not do to be conformant.
Best
Regards,
Tony
|
Tony
Fletcher
Technical
Advisor
Choreology
Ltd. 68, Lombard Street, London EC3V 9L J
UK |
Phone:
|
+44
(0) 1473 729537 |
Mobile:
|
+44
(0) 7801 948219 |
Fax:
|
+44
(0) 870 7390077 |
Web: |
www.choreology.com |
Cohesions™ |
Business
transaction management software for application
coordination |
Work: tony.fletcher@choreology.com
|
Home:
amfletcher@iee.org |
2004-08-27_Contribution to WSBPEL on Conformance.doc
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]