OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 82 - Proposal for Vote


+1 - the sub group had no such restrictions on its chater so why add
them in now?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Monica J. Martin [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: 13 October 2004 19:28
>To: rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com
>Cc: ygoland@bea.com; Martin Chapman; wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 82 - Proposal for Vote
>
>
>rkhalaf wrote:
>
>> Hi Monica,
>>
>> The proposal in (1) makes abstract BPEL's syntax a strict superset of
>> executable BPEL. This is not what is in the specification.
>>
>> The issue 82 is to clarify what abstract bpel is (mainly wordsmithing
>> as the issue states) and to have a better definition not to change 
>> what it is or how it is.  The other issues are being used to do that 
>> such as 107 etc .. Changing structure goes under rearchitecting.
>>
>mm1: This restriction was not a part of the subgroup discussion, and 
>clearly was not placed on the scope of the recent TC 
>participation until 
>you specified it.  Why did the subgroup spend 5+ months trying 
>to define 
>it if the boundary was the specification as a gate? To coin 
>Satish, this 
>is 'false economy.' Thank you.
>
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]