Issue - 171 - faultName should be optional for invoke fault handlers

[ws-bpel issues list editor<peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")

The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 171 - faultName should be optional for invoke fault handlers

Status: received
Date added: 18 Oct 2004
Categories: Syntax & semantics
Date submitted: 15 October 2004
Submitter: Yuzo Fujishima
Champion: Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com>
Document: WSBPEL Working Draft, September 8, 2004
Description: In 6.2 and 11.3 of the specification, the faultName attribute of a catch element of an invoke element is shown to be mandatory.
     <catch faultName="qname" faultVariable="ncname"?
                              faultMessageType="qname"?>*
To be consistent with a fault handler defined for a process or a scope, this attribute should be optional.
Submitter's proposal:

In 6.2 and 11.3, replace

     faultName="qname"
with
     faultName="qname"?

Changes: 18 Oct 2004 - new issue

---

To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 171 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 171 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).

Choreology Anti virus scan completed