RE: [wsbpel] Clarification on correlation sets example (sec. 10.2)

["Ugo Corda" <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>]

Yaron,
I actually already did. It is now issue 172.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yaron Y. Goland [mailto:ygoland@bea.com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 12:09 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Clarification on correlation sets 
> example (sec. 10.2)
> 
> 
> Ugo, can you please open this as a bug so we can track it? I 
> hate seeing 
> good points fall through the cracks.
> 	Thanks,
> 		Yaron
> 
> Ugo Corda wrote:
> > BPEL implementers at my company found the example in sec. 10.2 
> > confusing, and I agree with them. Here are a couple of problems:
> > 
> > 1) The AsynchPurchaseResponse invoke uses the correlation set 
> > PurchaseOrder. But this correlation set is defined as 
> aliases over the 
> > message POMessage, not over the message POResponse used by 
> the invoke. 
> > So there is no connection between the correlation set and 
> the message 
> > used by the activity. This looks like a mistake made when 
> writing the 
> > example, like something missing in the list of alias definitions.
> > 
> > 2) The same invoke also uses the correlation set Invoice, 
> but there is 
> > no connection between that correlation set and the message 
> used by the 
> > invoke (POResponse). Does this make sense? In other words, 
> is it legal 
> > to set the value of a correlation set in abstract like 
> that, without 
> > referring to a specific message used in the activity?
> > 
> > Ugo
> > 
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from 
> the roster 
> > of the
> > OASIS TC), go to 
> > 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/le
ave_workgroup.php.
>