OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespaceallowed?



Hi, all,

I just would like to point out that the <bpel:import> construct of BPEL can import both WSDL and XSD.

It is legal to import multiple XSD of the same TNS from different locations using <xsd:import> within a schema location.

Therefore, I think <bpel:import> construct should allow importing multiple XSD of the same TNS also.

Thus, I tend to think a similar semantics should be carried over to allow importing multiple WSDL of the same TNS from different location as well. I would like to hear more WSDL experts to confirm this usage situation will not create problems.

Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu




ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:

This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")

The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.

Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed?

Status: received
Date added: 23 Oct 2004
Categories: Related standards
Date submitted: 27 September 2004
Submitter: Jim Clune
Description: Is it legal to have a BPEL process with two BPEL import elements each pointing to WSDLs of the same namespace, but different locations? The Document Linking section of the spec does not explicitly disallow this. One might interpret this situation as legal, and one might further interpret references to WSDL elements within such a process as resolving so long as each element resolves to one of the imported WSDLs for that namespace.

The text should be clear.
Changes: 23 Oct 2004 - new issue


To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 174 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 174 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.

To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).

Choreology Anti virus scan completed



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]