[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespaceallowed?
Isn't this issue addressed in question 4 of issue 88? ws-bpel issues list editor wrote: > This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". > The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug > in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be > closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable") > > The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL > TC pages <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel> on a regular > basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the > document entitled ** in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list > <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/documents.php> - the next > posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working > copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at > this constant URL <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html>. > > > Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed? > > *Status:* received > *Date added:* 23 Oct 2004 > *Categories:* Related standards <#category_related_standards> > *Date submitted:* 27 September 2004 > *Submitter:* Jim Clune <mailto:jim@parasoft.com> > *Description:* Is it legal to have a BPEL process with two BPEL import elements > each pointing to WSDLs of the same namespace, but different locations? The > Document Linking section of the spec does not explicitly disallow this. One > might interpret this situation as legal, and one might further interpret > references to WSDL elements within such a process as resolving so long as each > element resolves to one of the imported WSDLs for that namespace. > > The text should be clear. > *Changes:* 23 Oct 2004 - new issue > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please > follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying > to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure > the subject line as you send it *starts* "Issue - 174 - [anything]" or is a > reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open > issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 174 - Proposed resolution", > without any Re: or similar. > > To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new > issue submission is the sender of this announcement). > > > Choreology Anti virus scan completed >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]