i thought that this issue was whether 2 separate things that are
imported from different files can have the same namespace. but i agree
that when i read question 4, it's different.
Prasad Yendluri wrote:
It seems to me question 4 of issue 88 and this one are different though
related issues.
Question 4 is speaking to a (particular) definition imported via two
different files (directly, indirectly etc. I take).
Where as this issue has to do with, can one import the same (WSDL) file
twice.
Regards, Prasad
-------- Original Message --------
Isn't this issue addressed in question 4 of issue 88?
ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
> This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received".
> The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as identifying a bug
> in the spec or decides it should be accepted specially. Otherwise it will be
> closed without further consideration (but will be marked as "Revisitable")
>
> The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL
> TC pages <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel> on a regular
> basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the
> document entitled ** in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/documents.php> - the next
> posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working
> copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at
> this constant URL <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html>.
>
>
> Issue - 174 - Are multiple imports with the same namespace allowed?
>
> *Status:* received
> *Date added:* 23 Oct 2004
> *Categories:* Related standards <#category_related_standards>
> *Date submitted:* 27 September 2004
> *Submitter:* Jim Clune <mailto:jim@parasoft.com>
> *Description:* Is it legal to have a BPEL process with two BPEL import elements
> each pointing to WSDLs of the same namespace, but different locations? The
> Document Linking section of the spec does not explicitly disallow this. One
> might interpret this situation as legal, and one might further interpret
> references to WSDL elements within such a process as resolving so long as each
> element resolves to one of the imported WSDLs for that namespace.
>
> The text should be clear.
> *Changes:* 23 Oct 2004 - new issue
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please
> follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying
> to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure
> the subject line as you send it *starts* "Issue - 174 - [anything]" or is a
> reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open
> issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 174 - Proposed resolution",
> without any Re: or similar.
>
> To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new
> issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
>
>
> Choreology Anti virus scan completed
|