Issue - 175 - Supporting WSDL Overloading in BPEL

["Eckenfels. Bernd" <B.Eckenfels@seeburger.de>]

Hello,

 

I strongly agree with the Idea to declare overloading not supported and mention WS-I in the rationale. This would make the activity signatures so messy, otherwise.

 

So I agree with Yarons suggestion and agree that it is an actual problem we need to address.

 

Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Bernd Eckenfels
Chief Architect
--
SEEBURGER AG - Edisonstr.1 , D-75015 Bretten, Germany
Fax: +49 (0)7252 96-2400 - Phone: +49 (0)7252 96-1256
mailto:b.eckenfels@seeburger.de - http://www.seeburger.de

-----Original Message-----
From: ws-bpel issues list editor [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 2:16 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 175 - Supporting WSDL Overloading in BPEL

Issue - 175 - Supporting WSDL Overloading in BPEL

 Submitter's proposal: I can see two ways to solve this issue. The one I prefer is that we just declare in the spec that BPEL doesn't support overloaded WSDLs and call it a day.