[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue 163 - Proposal For Vote
If we can’t come up with a schema for the fault data then I wonder how useful such a fault would be – it would then fall in the category of “infrastructure faults” which we cannot usefully specify. S.
From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com]
I lost this issue in the shuffle somehow. Thanks
to Yaron for being on the other side of the whip. Please accept my
submitted proposal as such (deleting/ignoring the question). Now submitted as 163, with status "received". It is presumably open to the TC to accept this as a bug, treat Danny's solution as a proposed resolution to the then open issue, and agree the resolution in a matter of 5 minutes, since the f-t-f is quorate. Peter
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]