[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: applying extensibility uniformly to <partnerLinkType>, <role>, <property>and <propertyAlias>
Hi, all, I am double checking our current XSD grammar for <partnerLinkType>, <role>, <property> and <propertyAlias>. I found out that those constructs are actually NOT extensible, unlike most of other BPEL constructs. I was quite surprised by that. I think we should apply extensibility uniformly to <partnerLinkType>, <role>, <property> and <propertyAlias>. What do you guys think? Most likely I will file two bug issues regarding to extensibility syntax: (1) For this uniform extensibility application (2) To make BPEL extensibility syntax closer to XSD extensibility syntax to avoid ambigious parse tree problems that we discovered during Issue 11.1 and etc. Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]