[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] issue 111.1: Fixing up extensibility syntax in BPELby using <annotation> pattern
Hi Bernd, Actually after more consideration, I am not sure we should use <extension> because I believe it has created confusion already between Issue 92 and Issue 111.1. Issue 92 uses <extension> for extension usage declaration at the <process> or <scope> level. That is, what extension is used and whether it MUST be understood. Issue 111.1 is about the extension / annotation itself at any Extensible BPEL construct. E.g. <assign>, <sequence> and etc. E.g. making <assign> transaction-aware. Unless Issue 92 changes the wording from <extension> to <declareExtension>, I would not try to re-use <extension> for Issue 111.1 (instead of I would use <annotation>.) Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Eckenfels. Bernd wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]