Issue 148 - Proposal For Vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

148 - Explicitly state that solicit/response & notification aren't 
supported by BPEL

Proposal: Make it a static error to submit a BPEL that includes a 
notification or solicit/response operation.

Rationale: We don't support them, we just never bothered to actually 
state that.

Section 3

From: While WS-BPEL attempts to provide as much compatibility with WSDL 
1.1 as possible there are two areas where such compatibility has proven 
impossible.

To: While WS-BPEL attempts to provide as much compatibility with WSDL 
1.1 as possible there are three areas where such compatibility has 
proven impossible.

From: The other area is in support for overloaded operation names in 
WSDL portTypes.

To: Another area is in support for overloaded operation names in WSDL 
portTypes.

Add the following after the sentence "This restriction was deemed 
appropriate as overloaded operations are rare, they are actually banned 
in the WS-I Basic Profile and supporting them was felt to introduce more 
complexity than benefit.": Finally a WS-BPEL processor MUST reject a 
WS-BPEL that refers to a portType that contain solicit-response or 
notification operations as defined in the WSDL 1.1 specification, this 
requirement MUST be statically enforced.