RE: [wsbpel] Issue 133 - Proposal For Vote

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

Although writing a generic handler based on "reflection" on the fault data is possible, the same effect can be produced for the same effort in most cases where you actually know what to do by writing a specific fault handler rather than defering to a catchAll.
 
I support Yaron's proposal to close it with no action.

________________________________

From: Danny van der Rijn [mailto:dannyv@tibco.com]
Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 4:03 PM
Cc: wsbpeltc
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 133 - Proposal For Vote



I thought the proposal in the issue statement was reasonable.

Yaron Y. Goland wrote:

> Depending on the group's mood it can pick which proposal for vote it
> prefers:
>
> Choice #1 - I move that we close this issue with no action.
>
> Choice #2 - I move that this issue be subjected to automatic closure
> under the 4/1 deadline since it has no proposal for vote.
>
>
>     Yaron
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php