Re: [wsbpel] Issue 82 - proposal to vote

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Rania Khalaf wrote:

>
> Here is the combined 82. There was a request for one more item that 
> there is disagreement on, so that will be brought up in the discussion 
> and i will send it in a following note. I suppose the way to handle 
> that is as an amendment that we vote on.
>
> Regards,
> Rania
>
>
> ----------------------------------
> Abstract Processes. Major Diffs in Spec.
>
> 1. Introduction
> ----------------
> •Reword:
> - Fourth paragraph to : “What are the concepts required to describe 
> business processes? To answer these questions, consider the following”.
> - Substitute “Business Protocols” with “Business processes” in the 
> bullets of this paragraph.
>
> •Move from Intro, and use as input to AP1.1 refactoring section:
> -“if we wish to provide …. to capture the essence of public behavior 
> while hiding private aspects.”

mm1: I had understood in the F2F, that we could leave this verbiage here 
and reference it in the AP v1.1 refactoring. The AP v1.1 is only an 
example of this type of usage.