[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] Issue - 180 - Proposal to Vote
Friendly amendment: and clean up any current language in 11.3 that contradicts this. ________________________________ From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] Sent: Wed 5/4/2005 8:18 AM To: wsbpeltc; Alex Yiu Cc: Satish Thatte Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 180 - Proposal to Vote Hi, It looks like my suggestions are accepted by a bunch of people. Here I formally submit the propsal to vote: Actual Text Changes Suggestion: In Section 11.3, add the following to the end of the paragraph which starts with "Note that a WSDL fault is identified ... " ------------------------------------- Even though a fault in WS-BPEL is just identified by the fault name, it does NOT enforce that faults of a particular fault name can be associated with one fault message type. On the contrary, faults of a particular fault name can be associated with multiple message types and the <catch> construct in WS-BPEL facilitates differentiation of faults with different (message) types of the same fault name. ------------------------------------- Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]