[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 111 - Syntax Choices for Extension Activity (WebBallot)
Option 1 is in fact a new vote on issue 111.1 which we closed in Waldorf: we already rejected a proposal almost exactly like this, as I recall. In that case we would need to explicitly reopen issue 111.1. If that is what is intended you should say so and ask for a reopening of 111.1 explicitly. I think the TC deserves this level of clarity. Paco Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle. To: wsbpeltc <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org> com> cc: Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>, "Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com> Subject: [wsbpel] Issue - 111 - Syntax Choices for Extension Activity (Web 05/17/2005 07:41 Ballot) PM Hi all, Here is the details of the web ballot (proposed) for Extension Activity Syntax. The web-ballot is NORMATIVE. That is, a binding vote on a partial solution for 111 which would then constrain the remaining completion of the resolution. Similar to what we did with 82 where we approved a partial solution that set a direction and filled in the details later with a vote on the additions. In short, we shall finish the actual proposal for Issue 111 to vote based on the result of this web-ballot. (I hope the color scheme make it easier for comparision) Option #1: moving the extension to wrapper to generic extension points (<extendedBy>) ----------------------------- <sequence>