Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 217 - Need new name for <compensate>

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

+1.  We would also need to clarify in the schema and spec text when each 
of these is allowed, as currently, I believe that there are cases when 
one should be allowed, but not the other.

Danny

ws-bpel issues list editor wrote:
> This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of 
> "received". The status will be changed to "open" if the TC accepts it as 
> identifying a bug in the spec or decides it should be accepted 
> specially. Otherwise it will be closed without further consideration 
> (but will be marked as "Revisitable")
> 
> The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS 
> WSBPEL TC pages <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel> on 
> a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most 
> recent version of the document entitled ** in the "Issues" folder of the 
> WSBPEL TC document list 
> <http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/documents.php> - 
> the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list 
> editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is 
> announced, is available at this constant URL 
> <http://www.choreology.com/external/WS_BPEL_issues_list.html>.
> 
> 
>     Issue - 217 - Need new name for <compensate>
> 
> *Status:* received
> *Date added:* 8 Jun 2005
> *Categories:* Compensation <#category_compensation>
> *Date submitted:* 07 June 2005
> *Submitter:* Yaron Y. Goland <mailto:ygoland@bea.com>
> *Description:* The semantics of <compensate/> are to call the local 
> compensation handler for the enclosing scope, an activity that can occur 
> even in a fault handler. The semantics of <compensate scope=".."/> is to 
> call the installed compensation handler on a successfully completed 
> child scope. The semantics of these two actions are very different but 
> they share the same activity name which leads to confusion.
> *Submitter’s proposal:* I would propose splitting these into two 
> activities. <defaultCompensate> and <compensate scope="..."/>.
> *Changes:* 8 Jun 2005 - new issue
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), 
> please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org 
> list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to 
> that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it *starts* "Issue - 
> 217 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to 
> formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject 
> line "Issue - 217 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
> 
> To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address 
> for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
> 
> 
> Choreology Anti virus scan completed