Re: [wsbpel] Issue - 180 - Proposal For Vote

[Danny van der Rijn <dannyv@tibco.com>]

+1

Yaron Y. Goland wrote:

> I propose that we close the issue with no change.
>
> This proposal began life as an attempt to enforce BPEL 1.1's implicit 
> fault semantics which required that one fault name match to one fault 
> type. But with the resolution to 185 we have explicitly stated that we 
> support fault overloading. Therefore the motivation for this issue is 
> gone and we should just close it.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in 
> OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>