OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: Fw: [wsbpel] Issue - 157 - conf call brief recap ... and carryforward ...



Hi, all,

 From the sub-group conf call, I got an action item to clarify the 
difference between  "string-value" and "text-node" and verify how it 
affects the replacement table.

Actually after more thinking, we do not need to modify the "F2F Table" 
in general ...

-------------------------------------------
The "F2F Table":
 From \ To
	EII
	AII
	TII
EII with
Complex-Content
	RE
	F
	F
EII with
Simple-Content
	RE
	RC
	RC
AII
	RC
	RC
	RC
TII
	RC
	RC
	RC

-------------------------------------------

... I think we just need to add some clarification to the definition of 
TII and a footnote to this table:

-------------------------------------------
*Clarified Definition of TII: *(to be added)
TII is a sequence of _zero or more_ CII. When it is mapped to XPath 1.0 
model, it is a generalization of String-Value (which has zero or more 
characters) and Text Node (which has one or more characters). RValue of 
a TII can be mapped to a String-Value or a Text Node in XPath 1.0, while 
LValue of a TII can be only mapped to a Text node.

*Foot-note to the "F2F-Table"*:

    * Information items referenced by the to-spec MUST be a Lvalue. (As
      stated in Issue 103)
    * In XPath 1.0 data model, only Text Node can constitute a LValue of
      TII.

-------------------------------------------


I think that should be good enough.
What do you guys think?



Regards,
Alex Yiu




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]