[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Fw: [wsbpel] Issue - 157 - conf call brief recap ... and carryforward ...
Hi, all, From the sub-group conf call, I got an action item to clarify the difference between "string-value" and "text-node" and verify how it affects the replacement table. Actually after more thinking, we do not need to modify the "F2F Table" in general ... ------------------------------------------- The "F2F Table": From \ To EII AII TII EII with Complex-Content RE F F EII with Simple-Content RE RC RC AII RC RC RC TII RC RC RC ------------------------------------------- ... I think we just need to add some clarification to the definition of TII and a footnote to this table: ------------------------------------------- *Clarified Definition of TII: *(to be added) TII is a sequence of _zero or more_ CII. When it is mapped to XPath 1.0 model, it is a generalization of String-Value (which has zero or more characters) and Text Node (which has one or more characters). RValue of a TII can be mapped to a String-Value or a Text Node in XPath 1.0, while LValue of a TII can be only mapped to a Text node. *Foot-note to the "F2F-Table"*: * Information items referenced by the to-spec MUST be a Lvalue. (As stated in Issue 103) * In XPath 1.0 data model, only Text Node can constitute a LValue of TII. ------------------------------------------- I think that should be good enough. What do you guys think? Regards, Alex Yiu
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]