Issue 88 - comments to proposal

[Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>]

Resending with subject line...

----- Forwarded by Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM on 07/20/2005 08:44 AM
-----
                                                                                                                                          
                      Francisco Curbera                                                                                                   
                                               To:       <wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org>                                                    
                      07/19/2005 11:16         cc:                                                                                        
                      PM                       From:     Francisco Curbera/Watson/IBM@IBMUS                                               
                                               Subject:                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                          



Diane was kind enough to let me know the summary of comments that came up
during the discussion of issue 88 last week (which I missed). Here are my
comments to those comments:

   "consider changing import name since its used in different ways by other
   specs". We discussed this before. Import in BPEL does fundamentally the
   same thing as import in WSDL and XSD. Using a different word will only
   confuse everyone.
   "add a clarification that location attribute is a "hint" vs physical
   location as in xsd import". I don't understand the "vs physical location
   in xsd". SchemaLocation is a hint as well.
   "clarify whether referencing of wsdl artifacts from indirect import is
   allowed or not." This is already clarified in my updated proposal. The
   answer is "yes".
   "in 1B add "for example" to the text in the parenthesis about xsd
   redefinition". OK


Paco