RE: [wsbpel] agenda for Oct 5

["Furniss, Peter" <Peter.Furniss@choreology.com>]

That was because the script is a bit literal-minded and the subject line
was "Propsoal to vote".

I've corrected the list, and hope your propsoal is accepted (or possibly
appected :-) by the TC.

Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rania Khalaf [mailto:rkhalaf@watson.ibm.com] 
> Sent: 04 October 2005 16:04
> To: Diane Jordan
> Cc: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [wsbpel] agenda for Oct 5
> 
> 
> Hi Diane,
> 
> I sent the proposal on friday, but it hasn't shown up on the website 
> under 'proposal' ...
> 
> r
> 
> Diane Jordan wrote:
> > 
> > The next call of the WS BPEL TC will be on Wed. Oct. 5 at 8 am 
> > Pacific.
> >  Dial in info is: USA & Canada Toll Free Number: +1 866 500 
> 6738, Pass 
> > code: 600345, All Others (toll): +1 203 480 8000, Pass 
> code: 600345.  We 
> > will also have access to LiveMeeting - see the calendar 
> entry for more 
> > info on accessing it.
> > 
> > Summary of Sept. 28 call:
> > - Location of the next f2f should be decided by Oct. 26 if we are 
> > going
> > to attempt to meet in early Dec.  
> > - issue 82.2 passed in concept.  Write up of the resolution to be 
> > provided for vote on final resolution and closure.  
> > - 193 - closed with resolution proposed in Sept. 26 email 
> from Prasad 
> > with no objections.  
> > 
> > Proposed agenda for next meeting:
> > - Nomination/volunteers to take minutes for this call  
> > - Roll call/determine quorum
> > - Review/accept minutes from  previous meeting(s) - Sept 28
> > - Review agenda
> > - Discuss plan for next f2f meeting
> > - Subgroup reports as available    
> > - Specification Editing status
> > - Issue discussion.  Note we will follow the agreed to process of 
> > limiting discussions of any issue on calls to no more than 
> 30 minutes at 
> > the end of which the person who made the motion can choose 
> to table to 
> > next meeting or force a vote (without requiring 2/3 
> majority to stop 
> > discussion).   Those who want to continue to discuss need 
> to go off line 
> > to work the issue.  At next meeting progress should be 
> reported - or 
> > issue will go to vote with original proposal.  If issue 
> goes to a vote 
> > process starts again as above.  If results of offline 
> discussions result 
> > in amended proposal to vote, the new proposal should be 
> provided to the 
> > TC in advance of voting meeting.
> > Proposals to vote
> > - 82.3 - if updated proposal received
> > - 82.2  - if proposal received  
> > - 120.2
> > - 6.4
> > - 11 -  see my separate email on status of motions/amendments  
> > - 6.2 - "part b" - should the resolution be extended so that the 
> > completion condition applies to serial as well as parallel 
> for each. 
> >  Danny and Alex to write up formal proposal.  
> > - 222 (motion to rescind)
> > - 125
> > 
> > Long running issues
> > -> issue 9: deferred pending inclusion of 84 in spec
> > -> 99: defer pending 82.3
> > 
> > Agenda for next meeting
> > New business
> > 
> > Regards,
> > John Evdemon and Diane Jordan
> > WS-BPEL TC Co-chairs
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS 
> TC that generates this mail.  You may a link to this group 
> and all your TCs in OASIS
> at: 
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgr
oups.php