[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Fault in Compensation
Hi Yuzo, This question falls into Issue 226 domain. The resolution of Issue 226 needs to be able to answer your question clearly. (I will forward this email to issue 226 thread later.) My current interpretation: Q1: No there will not be the second invocation of CH1. Once the compensation handler of a completed scope got faulted, the whole scope also considered faulted (maybe we can come up with a more specialized term for that). (We need a life cycle diagram of "scope" here in the spec) The CH of such a scope should be uninstalled. (Because, if not uninstalled, the CH may be in a strange inconsistent state, where the CH logic may executed incorrectly, if it got executed twice.) Q2: Yes, the T1 should be propagated to S2 and handled by F2. Dieter and Satish, if my interpretation is different from yours and your collection of the preliminary direction discussed in Redmond F2F, please let me know. Thanks! Regards, Alex Yiu Yuzo Fujishima wrote: Hi, |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]