[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Issue - 234 - Link Crossing Termination Handler Boundary
This issue has been added to the wsbpel issue list with a status of "received". The status will be changed to "open" if a motion to open the issue is proposed and that motion is approved by the TC. A motion could also be proposed to close it without further consideration. Otherwise it will remain as "received".
The issues list is posted as a Technical Committee document to the OASIS WSBPEL TC pages on a regular basis. The current edition, as a TC document, is the most recent version of the document entitled in the "Issues" folder of the WSBPEL TC document list - the next posting as a TC document will include this issue. The list editor's working copy, which will normally include an issue when it is announced, is available at this constant URL.
* a link must not cross the boundary of a while or forEach activity, an isolated scope, an event handler or a compensation handlerand
* a link that crosses a fault-handler boundary MUST be outbound.
Should there be any restriction for a link that crosses
the boundary of a termination handler?
Submitter's proposal:
I think at least an incoming link into a termination handler must be prohibited because a termination handler should not / cannot wait for status determination of incoming links.
As for an outgoing link, I am not sure. Prohibiting it is perfectly fine with me. But for the same reason that an outgoing link from a fault handler is allowed, an outgoing link from a termination handler may be allowed.
Champions: Yuzo Fujishima <fujishima@bc.jp.nec.com>
Changes: 15 Nov 2005 - new issue
To comment on this issue (including whether it should be accepted), please follow-up to this announcement on the wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org list (replying to this message should automatically send your message to that list), or ensure the subject line as you send it starts "Issue - 234 - [anything]" or is a reply to such a message. If you want to formally propose a resolution to an open issue, please start the subject line "Issue - 234 - Proposed resolution", without any Re: or similar.
To add a new issue, see the issues procedures document (but the address for new issue submission is the sender of this announcement).
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]