Issue - 229 - directional proposal

[Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>]

Hi all,

As mentioned in today conf call, Chris and I share a high-level 
consensus that choice #4 in the original issue description would be a 
good direction to close Issue 229.

(Copied and paste here again)
=========================
after a user calls <compensate name="..."> allow them to call 
<compensate/> which will compensate all remaining child scopes in the 
default order. This would require changing the following text at the end 
of section 13.3.3: "Note that the <compensate/> activity in a fault or 
compensation handler attached to scope S causes the default-order 
invocation of compensation handlers for completed scopes directly nested 
within S. The use of this activity can be mixed with any other 
user-specified behavior except the explicit invocation of <compensate 
scope="Sx"/> for scope Sx nested directly within S. Explicit invocation 
of compensation for such a scope nested within S disables the 
availability of default-order compensation, as expected."
=========================

We would like to draft up the formal proposal for Issue 229 along that 
direction after Dieter finishes his spec wording for Issue 207, 216, and 
226.

As suggested by Diane, we would like to pass the above as the direction 
proposal for this issue.
Thanks!


Regards,
Alex Yiu