RE: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 229 - directional proposal

["Satish Thatte" <satisht@microsoft.com>]

I don't see a problem with that .. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 5:43 PM
To: Satish Thatte
Cc: wsbpeltc; Chris Keller; Dieter Koenig1; Alex Yiu
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] RE: Issue - 229 - directional proposal


That is correct, per my understanding. :-)


Regards,
Alex Yiu


Satish Thatte wrote:

>The idea would be to leverage the fact that calling compensate on a
>child scope a second time is a no-op?  So that default order
>compensation just rolls on over that no-op?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Yiu [mailto:alex.yiu@oracle.com] 
>Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 9:53 AM
>To: wsbpeltc
>Cc: Chris Keller; 'Dieter Koenig1'; Satish Thatte; Alex Yiu
>Subject: Issue - 229 - directional proposal
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>As mentioned in today conf call, Chris and I share a high-level 
>consensus that choice #4 in the original issue description would be a 
>good direction to close Issue 229.
>
>(Copied and paste here again)
>=========================
>after a user calls <compensate name="..."> allow them to call 
><compensate/> which will compensate all remaining child scopes in the 
>default order. This would require changing the following text at the
end
>
>of section 13.3.3: "Note that the <compensate/> activity in a fault or 
>compensation handler attached to scope S causes the default-order 
>invocation of compensation handlers for completed scopes directly
nested
>
>within S. The use of this activity can be mixed with any other 
>user-specified behavior except the explicit invocation of <compensate 
>scope="Sx"/> for scope Sx nested directly within S. Explicit invocation

>of compensation for such a scope nested within S disables the 
>availability of default-order compensation, as expected."
>=========================
>
>We would like to draft up the formal proposal for Issue 229 along that 
>direction after Dieter finishes his spec wording for Issue 207, 216,
and
>
>226.
>
>As suggested by Diane, we would like to pass the above as the direction

>proposal for this issue.
>Thanks!
>
>
>Regards,
>Alex Yiu
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
>at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 
>
>  
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php