OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

wsbpel message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21


Title: Message
Well, I guess I'll check back for the 2nd hour.  Listening to 1/2 hour of this hold music has numbed my brain.

Mehta, Vinkesh (US - Austin) wrote:
Diane had said yesteday on the editors call yesterday that she will be an hour late. So I think John is supposed to start the call.


From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com]
Sent: Wed 12/21/2005 10:16 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21

8:15 pst and still no con call leader;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Diane Jordan [mailto:drj@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 5:14 AM
To: wsbpel@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [wsbpel] agenda for Dec 21


The next call of the WS BPEL TC will be on Wed. Dec. 21 at 8 am Pacific.  Dial in info is: USA & Canada Toll Free Number: +1 866 500 6738, Pass code: 600345, All Others (toll): +1 203 480 8000, Pass code: 600345.  We will use an irc chat at:    http://webconf.soaphub.org/conf/room/wsbpel  

NOTE:  TC Conference calls for Dec. 28 and Jan 4 have been cancelled.  After Dec. 21, our next meeting will be the face to face in Raleigh, NC on Jan 10-12.  If you will not be attending the f2f either in person or by phone, please consider requesting a leave of absence.  

Summary of Dec 14 call:
Update on primer plan - work is progressing.  Call planned for Dec. 16.
123: proposal from Dec 14 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00074.html) passed with two amendments:
1.  remove the following from 123:  Further if an open IMA goes out of scope prior to being closed by a reply activity then the scope MUST throw a bpws:missingReply fault.  In other words a scope which declares a partnerLink or messageExchange used by an IMA will not complete normally if that IMA is open when the scope is to complete.
2.  replace:
Default message exchange instances, just like non-default messages exchanges, are created each time the default message exchange provider is executed.  For example each time an onEvent is executed (i.e. when a new message arrives for processing) it creates a new default message exchange instance associated with each onEvent instance.
with:  
Default message exchange instances, just like non-default messages exchanges, are made available each time the default message exchange provider is executed.  For example each time an onEvent is executed (i.e. when a new message arrives for processing) it makes available a new default message exchange instance associated with each onEvent instance.
229: proposal just available this morning.  It will be discussed by email for possible vote at next meeting.  
110: proposal from Dec 9 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00058.html) passed
82.1:  discussion continuing
88: no action required.  This was just a clarification of the schema, not a new proposal.  
236: proposal from Dec. 7 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00047.html) passed.  
237: proposal from Dec. 7 (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00044.html ) passed.
239:  motion made and seconded (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/wsbpel/200512/msg00046.html ).  Further discussion deferred to next meeting.
240:  issue opened.  

Proposed agenda for next meeting:  
- Nomination/volunteers to take minutes for this call  
- Roll call/determine quorum
- Review/accept minutes from  previous meeting(s) - Dec. 7, 14

- Review agenda
- Subgroup reports as available
- Specification Editing status

- Issue discussion.  Note we will follow the agreed to process of limiting discussions of any issue on calls to no more than 30 minutes at the end of which the person who made the motion can choose to table to next meeting or force a vote (without requiring 2/3 majority to stop discussion).   Those who want to continue to discuss need to go off line to work the issue.  At next meeting progress should be reported – or issue will go to vote with original proposal.  If issue goes to a vote process starts again as above.  If results of offline discussions result in amended proposal to vote, the new proposal should be provided to the TC in advance of voting meeting.
Proposals to vote
229
82.1
239
 
Agenda for next meeting:
Proposed agenda items for face to face on Jan 10-12:
- review all open issues and work on proposals to close
- primer status
- other agenda topics?  
 
New business
 
Regards,
John Evdemon and Diane Jordan
WS-BPEL TC Co-chairs


This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. 

Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. [v.E.1]


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]